email alerts

To receive email alerts for new posts of this blog, enter your address below.

Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Fire, oaks, rare plants, and civilization - through photos

Sometimes as we stewards walk and look and think ... we take photos, so we can share the thoughts they illustrate and ask for feedback and discussion. This post resulted from such a walk. 

We had hoped for a burn.

This mowed path is the 2024 firebreak through the savanna. We'd hoped for a good burn in the fall. Much of Somme Prairie Grove is too wet in spring for an effective burn. Some sites got good burns in November, but we're short on human resources More volunteers and staff who are trained, experienced, determined, and deeply care are needed to give biodiversity the nurture it deserves.

What caused this?
Benefits and evils - of shade and civilization - are on display here. This old bur oak predates its new neighbor, Dundee Road. When this tree was young, a couple of hundred years ago, there was shade to its left (east) but open prairie to the right (west). Huge old limbs survive to this day on the sunny side. Limbs on the east were amputated by shade of other trees (though, thanks to recent restoration, new limbs are sprouting there). 

As for the road and cars and houses, civilization, using the word charitably, saved this preserve from the plow and the bulldozer. If it had stood well outside the metro area, it would almost certainly have become a cornfield.

Here again, that firebreak is visible, parallel to the road. We'll burn here only with a wind from the south. Smoke management is crucial in the midst of a major population center. But it is the great numbers of people that, through a process like panning for gold, end up rising to the occasion and providing the expert volunteers (and funding and staff) that make all the difference.

There are many more preserves in the metro area than in most rural counties, and it's more challenging to burn them, but much more of them get burned. 

Who trampled this? 
Two months ago, this area was tall, rare and uncommon sedges in an ephemeral pond. But it's a natural amphitheater, and every fall the bucks trample it to dust as the potential mates watch them compete from the high ground. Animal impacts on the plants are natural influences.

A drama under way
This south-facing savanna slope has more formerly-threatened savanna blazing stars (Liatris scariosa) than anywhere else in the preserve. So for years we pulled sweet-clover but chose not to broadcast seed, thinking it was better to leave well-enough alone. A few years ago we decided that we were just delaying the inevitable. This area needs a conservative turf to "be all it can be" and sustainable for the long term. So we broadcast the savanna seed mix.  It now has small, young warm-season grasses (dropseed, little blue, Indian) along with obedient plant, cream gentian, leadplant, rue anemone, and meadow parsnip (Thaspium). We're eager to learn as we watch it mature. 

A Tale of Two Trees
They're side by side. On the right is a Hill's oak, many skinny re-sprout stems up to three feet tall. They'll burn off again this year. On the left is a bur oak, one solid trunk about eight feet tall. 

Many years ago these two oak were the same size - about two feet tall. For some years we chose to protect the bur from fire and deer. It's now large enough to protect itself. A farmer had cut down most of the trees here prior to Forest Preserve acquisition. But savanna biodiversity here needs bur oaks scattered here and there, as discussed in more detail below.

Playing God With Oaks? 
Some accuse us of "playing God." Oh, please. The oak on the left with the impressively thick corky bark (uncomfortably in a cage for now) is more needed by this savanna than the still-leafy Hill's oak on the right. Scattered mature trees provide the full-to-dappled sun needed for savanna biodiversity. For three decades we said, naively, "Let the fire decide." If we'd been willing to wait a hundred years, perhaps chance would protect some trees. But for three decades all the young oaks burned off with every fire, and then the over-populated deer ate the re-sprouts mercilessly. This oak is nearly big enough to be released from its cage.

Freedom! 
Indeed, this bur is now free of its cage. I easily count fifteen Hill's oaks that are still burning back to shrubs with every fire. They're fine. Oak shrubs are part of the savanna habitat.  

Who did this!?
This oak was mutilated by buck deer, wreaking havoc with their antlers. They practice that way. You can see that this one was scarred years ago. This time the damage may girdle and kill it. We place cages at "antler height" to protect them from this until they're a bit bigger. Once the trunks are big enough that the deer can't bend them, they lose interest.

Why do this?
We cut - but did not herbicide - a Hill's oak that stood among many others, jointly making shade, as they grew bigger annually, too dense for the savanna vegetation that survived beneath them. In ages past, when the wilderness burned sometimes with much more intense fires, even larger thin-barked Hill's oaks would be "top killed" and start again as shrubs. But that was then.

Today, after too many decades of "not playing God," we cut oaks to reduce shade, so as not to lose the quality biodiversity that survived here (for an alternative see Sad Story, below). We cut most of the red oaks in this patch and about half of the Hill's oaks. 

Is this a high-quality savanna or woodland turf? 
A few feet from the re-sprouting oak above. It may not look like much today, but it is a diverse mix of conservative species. Some of those found here include:
Bent grass (Agrostis perannans)
Rue anemone (Anemonella thalictroides)
Meadow parsnip  (Thaspium trifoliatum)
 Robin's plantain (Erigeron pulchellus)
Savanna blazing star (Liatris scariosa)
Wild licorice (Gallium circaezans)
Cream gentian (Gentiana alba)
Wood rush (Luzula multiflora)
Grove sandwort (Moehringia lateriflora)
and many, many more (Plus plura)

Sad story
In our early days studying the savanna at Somme, this area was one of our treasures. Lots of New Jersey tea, violet wood sorrel, purple milkweed and other savanna species under the young trees. We made sure to burn it regularly. We monitored it with intensive quadrat sampling. We pulled all garlic mustard and sweet clover, now gone.

Then it died - or lost all its quality species. It was like the frog-in-boiling-water metaphor. We didn't notice - focusing elsewhere - because we thought it was great, and we were giving it all it needed. Shade slowly increased and increased. Trees grow. Finally we started girdling too-dense and too-shady trees (mostly bitternut hickory and red oak), like the tree second from the right here. But we were too late. Tall goldenrod took over. Here we and the ecosystem are starting again. 

Fortunately, we learn. Ecosystem health is as complicated as human health. More complicated, actually. Good stewards make fewer and fewer ineffective decisions. We celebrate more and more returning diversity and health. 

More sad story, but yet hope
The tree on the right is a red oak, dead, killed by fire, or something. On the left (skinny and pale) is a bur oak that grew like a pole, barely surviving, in the shade of the red. This beanpole bur is a pathetic specimen. But now, thanks to the death of that "red oak in the wrong place" - it's branching out and may have a fine future here. Studies show that the bur oak is the keystone tree species of the rich-soil savannas and woodlands here. 

Who killed these trees?
We did, of course. They were invasive black locust. We thought we could just girdle them, but the locust needs herbicide too. They've been dead for at least three decades. It's remarkable how they're still standing after all that time. One's even burned a bit but stands yet. All this takes sweet time. 

Two Fine "Prairie Grasses"
In the open savanna, warm season grasses rule. Richly russet little bluestem on the left; a fine-leaved clump of "prairie dropseed" on the right. 

Knowing the grasses helps the winter landscape speak to us. These two are among the best indicators of quality. If an area has none, we want to broadcast seed there.

It seems to trouble some people that the principal open savanna grasses are called "prairie grasses." The grasses are misnamed, because savanna consciousness arrived late. To be clearer, perhaps these should be called "warm-season" grasses. 

Five Fine Savanna Grasses

Four of them are warm-season grasses.
Little bluestem - richly russet
Dropseed - fine-leaved pale clumps
Indiangrass - tall and with an unbranched top
Big bluestem - tall and with a branched stem

But the fifth (and especially classy) grass here is Leiberg's panic grass, a cool-season grass. It has the palest leaves in this photo, short little leaves, for a grass. 

Though this area is rich in colorful rare flowers, butterflies, and birds. It's good to learn those grasses as they're key to savanna fire and structure. As we study and plan in the winter, they help us think.

And speaking of thinking, just for the fun of it, here are two last photos of what this area will look like during the next growing season:

Late June

Early September







16 comments:

  1. It’s inspiring to learn that this much complexity, history, drama & beauty exists in the heart of a dense urban area, accessible to those who slow down, taking the time to look & ask questions.

    At MacArthur Woods, in some places where I girdled sugar maples or where the forest preserve district controlled woody plants around deer stands, native sedges exploded on their own, forming a dense carpet. Those treatments cleared the understory but the overstory was still almost closed canopy. The 1939 aerial photos for these locations showed both closed & intermediate canopy. This result surprised me as I thought the shade had killed everything. I wonder how much time needs to pass for excessive shade to permanently kill savanna sedge/grass turf? In the spot where goldenrod moved in, was there decent sedge/grass coverage when you started restoration?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Appreciate the good comments and question. We've had some areas like you describe, but mostly just a lot of one or a few species of sedge. Our woods were heavily grazed. Some sedges are among the plants that resist grazing best. Except in the wetlands, we had almost no wooded areas with a diverse surviving turf. The one exception was between a managed trail and a road. Perhaps the road was fenced to keep the cows in, so some species could re-populate the preserve from there. And maintenance of the road and trail kept light levels a bit higher. Here some of the commoner species included Chicago leek, Penn sedge, Wood's stiff sedge, hepatica, shooting star, Short's aster, wood reed, both trilliums, and elm-leaved and zigzag goldenrods.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fire not occurring this fall was not from lack of resources. We received half the rain we should have in summer. What was missed in summer showed up in fall. Burning could have been done on only a few days this past fall. Those days were just into prescription and would have burned only lightly or patchily. In many cases, managers would choose to save the fuel until spring when there were better conditions for burning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In SE we also had a decent window after our in December before it snowed again. We'd had some severe cold, which meant that even nonnative cool season grasses were cured. The difficulty we had is we'd kind of switched modes upon the first snowfall. We'd burned all we expected to be able to burn in the fall (late October), but missed chances in early December for sites we're planning February/March burns for but for which opportunity presented early. I think we probably had about 15 good days between late October and December in terms of fuel moisture, RH, and wind speed (with direction depending on site). The late summer drought helped us, because it meant that at drier sites the later curing components went fully dormant in September.

      Delete
    2. *after our first snow melted in December*

      Delete
    3. dlcarterksu, consider yourself lucky. In Cook County I had thought maybe I had been taken off the email list. That is, until near the end of November when I received an email saying they had “not forgotten” about fall prescribed burn season. I saw Superior Street prairie was burned on this blog. The next day when the relative humidity got below 50 percent I tried to burn. A slope burned well, but the flat ground burned patchily. I’ll be burning again in spring trying to get fire to carry through blue grass that I could not get to burn in November.

      Delete
    4. I meant to say SE WI. By late November the humidity and precip of preceding days and nights matters much more due to the low sun angle and short day length than it does for late February or March burns.

      Delete
    5. The date I burned was Nov. 26th. There had been no precipitation for five days. However, the relative humidity remained high, under 70 to 80s, the day before I burned. I only had a few hours on Nov. 26th during the afternoon when a west to southwest wind drop the relative humidity to as low as 45 percent.

      Delete
    6. There were several days with good conditions for burning in early November. I think the problem was it was too warm on those days and herps were still out. In late November we got two marginal days. Another day had low relative humidity, but not enough wind. In December only two days had low enough relative humidity but was not too windy or cold. Overall this fall, there was only a handful of marginal days, each with only at most a few hours of burn weather in Cook county.

      Delete
  4. It's impossible not to be sympathetic with comments from "Anonymous" on the challenges of achieving good burns. And yet, with more resources, it would be possible to do better - recognizing that every year will present different problems. Many of our highest quality and most important prairies, woodlands, and wetlands are degrading badly from poor or too-infrequent burns. This is a big subject and deserves better treatment than can come from a series of blog comments. But it's worth pointing out that there are days when, if we (the conservation community) had more staff crews, contract crews, and expert volunteers, we could burn 100 sites on days when we now burn ten.

    Also, poor prescriptions and regulations both cause harm - unnecessarily. There are days when it might seem too too dry and windy to burn a prairie, but rarely-burned woodlands would benefit enormously and be completely safe. Prescriptions and regulations should do better to reflect such differences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All true, I just wanted there to be mention that the lack of fire on the ground this fall was not because of burn crews. Some years they burn in fall two weeks straight and can’t burn more because they need to give people rest. This just happens to not be one of those years.

      Also, savannas/woodlands are more dangerous to burn in more favorable fire conditions than prairies. This is because embers from trees can burn a long time starting spot fires when they get blown outside of a unit. This requires a lot of raking/leaf blowing to mitigate. Something that burn crews appreciate which will help get a site to the top of the list.

      Delete
  5. Joannemarie070707@gmail.comDecember 26, 2024 at 8:21 PM

    We, Friends of Sandy Ford Land and Water Reserve, are working on creating a restored prairie in 1 of 17 acres of previous Ag land within Sandy Ford Land and Water Reserve. We are clearing woody invasives, the IDNR will remediate the invasive grasses, and we are planning future prescribed burns in partnership Friends of Illinois Nature Preserves and supported by IDNR.

    We are interested in the prescribed fire classes conducted by Chicago Wilderness Alliance. The power of prescribed for prairie management and health is amazing!

    ReplyDelete
  6. We didn't express burn disappointment to complain. It's just a part of how the ecosystem feels to us, so we comment.

    On the other hand, the discussion on this one photo (out of seventeen) perhaps deserves a little more local detail. Somme could have burned well this fall.

    To those who claim a good burn wasn't possible, given the weather, we, the Somme volunteers, would respond that it might be more true to say that it wasn't practical, these days. But we could make more and better burns practical, with more resources and better plans and regulations. Much irreplaceable health and quality is being lost from many biodiversity sites.

    There were conditions that emerged at the last minute that would have produced good burns. Especially, many afternoons this fall would have supported better burns than are likely next spring.

    Many burners are not willing to start burns in mid-afternoon, when conditions are likely to be best (and safest, and with least smoke problems, because the smoke then rises sharply and comes down mostly over Lake Michigan). On the ground, burning brush piles, watching the weather, we mourn those lost afternoons.

    The practical reasons not to burn then include: union rules, inconvenience for staff with families, and others. But all-volunteer crews used to burn then regularly, as some people would do it eagerly.

    And there are many ways to solve these problems. Perhaps time, creativity, and determination will lead us to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, all-volunteer burn crews should be reinstated. Volunteers are allowed to chainsaw and burn brush piles. Both of which are dangerous when not done correctly. Participants in all volunteer burn crews should be required to have participated in a reasonable number of burns with staff, along with meeting other requirements. This is similar to what is required for volunteers to burn brush piles. Like chainsawing, staff would need to supervise burn crews beyond certain conditions. Especially for smaller low-intensity burns, a trained and experienced group of volunteers should be able to take ownership and do these burns.

      Delete
    2. YES, burns are not difficult to conduct with volunteers who have 'common sense', and attention to details. A source of problems is organizations that get dominated by rules/regulations set up by lawyers/insurance agencies who are interested in money rather than natural area goals.

      Delete
    3. There is a public interest in having rules and regulations relating to conducting prescribed burns. If the overseeing government entity gives permission for prescribed burning to occur (which they are already doing) and volunteer groups are trained and have shown they known and will follow a burn plan then I see no reason why volunteers could not conduct prescribed burns.

      Delete