This was a good burn to learn from. It also did a ton of ecological good for a rare and important site. Such burns don't just happen. It took a lot of good work to get to the photo below:
We started the day with a brief intro and some training (especially for those of us new to burning) as we put on our fire-resistant Nomex clothing:
The crew consisted of nine Restore Moraine volunteers, some never on a burn before. So we started out with the basics (as shown in the diagrams below) and how to use the tools. The key person here, still in a tee-shirt, is Illinois Natural Heritage Biologist and accredited burn boss Melissa Grycan. For more about how she led and taught, see Endnote 1.)
Leaders like Melissa (and the Friends of Illinois Nature Preserve burn-boss mentors) are always thinking about training new leaders and other effective contributors. An intro, like the one Melissa gave at the start of this burn, seems primarily for those who are new to burning, but it is at least equally important to the ongoing in-service training of others who will become burn leaders in time. Expertise is promoted by hearing principles in various forms, as they apply to different sites and situations.
After a second or third successful experience in some role, many people can be expected to be asked to mentor others or demonstrate some component of the training to them. People develop expertise: when strip fires may help, how to most effectively operate the water backpack, how to fill the drip torch, what is the best diesel/gasoline ratio under various conditions, how to best protect ourselves and each other from unnecessarily smoke, etc. Such participants gain not only technical expertise but also a cultural sense of the need to, and how to, help newer people learn.
More fire and more burn leaders are needed. Our staff and volunteer burn capacity is too small, as is demonstrated by the ongoing losses of biodiversity and natural ecosystem quality in Nature Preserves. Many have deteriorated because of lack of ‘burn bosses’ and ‘crew chiefs. (It’s fairly easy to train new volunteers to do much of the needed work. What takes time and skill is training leaders.)
In some areas, increasing numbers of new burners see themselves as being on the road to leadership in a community of expert stewards and burn practitioners.
Some burn managers make an effort to have new burners on the team as often as possible. It helps everyone’s learning. This same approach is valuable in restoration generally: having new people join in at workdays week after week keeps things fresh, and everyone continues to learn with an open, questioning mind. When we don't have new people coming on a regular basis, we find, unfortunately, even in the most community-conscious settings, that the approach can become rigid and opinionated. In contrast, welcoming and training new people, and thinking about their questions, encourages all, including veteran participants, to embrace an open culture, continuously wanting to learn new things and improving current best practices. In recent years this growth-focused approach has been a real game changer that may expand capacity exponentially.
Kettle Moraine Woodland, McHenry Co. (grade
C best of type mesic Quercus rubra-Q.alba
woodland, (282.7 trees/ha, 45.5 m /ha basal area).
This 30-acre woodland is the best known example
of a Quercus rubra-Q. alba woodland. This
structure apparently developed under post-
settlement fire protection, as the Public Land
Survey notes describe the area as a Quercus alba-
Q. velutina savanna, with 20.5 trees/ha. The site
was maintained by moderate grazing, which
reduced plot species richness but allowed survival
of a comparatively large number of native species.
The herb layer is dominated by Carex
pensylvanica. Fragaria virginiana, Allium
cernuum, Antennaria plantaginifolia, &
Amphicarpa bracteata. However, there are local
populations of prairie species such as Andropogon
scoparius, Heuchera richardsonii, Amorpha
canescens, & Ceanothus americanus, and
woodland species such as Carex hirsutella,
Smilacina stellata, Dodecatheon meadia, &
Hepatica americana. The Illinois endangered
Corallorhiza maculata and Lechea intermedia and
threatened Lathyrus ochroleucus occur in the
woodland. The tract is dedicated Nature Preserve,
and is being managed by prescribed burning.
(Schennum 1984)


.jpeg)






something I have yet to be seen discussed is how incomplete a burn before its not worth it?
ReplyDeleteNot area but in depth of leaf litter. Often the top leaves are dry and burn well while leaves next to the soil are damp and don't burn. The fire covers the ground completely but if you kick over the top ash layer there are untouched leaves there that haven't burned.
1/2 a burn?
Is a smaller flame much slower moving still effective even if it doesn't burn down to the soil?
Better a poor burn than no burn?
These are good points and good questions - well worth a whole blog post. Burns do various types of work, and different types of burns are successful at fulfilling various purposes.
ReplyDeleteSome conservative plants die if left covered by dense oak leaf litter. Any burn is possibly helpful for solving that problem.
A hotter burn will kill more invasive tree and shrub seedlings, will set back saplings, and at the right time will kill most garlic mustard and set back bluegrasses. A "milder" cold-season burn will do little of that.
Many species can't reproduce if their seed falls in dense oak leaf litter. The more a burn reduces that litter, the better for reproduction by those species.
Some people excuse weak burns on the basis of a claim that it's ecologically best for burns to be patchy. That may be true if the patchiness reflects the ecosystem, for example, if there are patches of native shrubs that are where they are because wet soils or other barriers protect them from most burns. On the other hand, in many sites today patchiness results from lack of fuel caused by tall goldenrod, briars, or shrubs eliminating (or preventing re-establishment of) natural fuel species. In this case the burns could be called "partial failures" because they are not contributing to the healing of the prairie or woodland ecosystem.
It would be good if there were more research into such questions. But experienced stewards and land managers understand such issues well enough to make good decisions.