Update: On May 28 we talked by phone with UL staff about this problem. We got the response: "We certainly don't want to put an Endangered species in jeopardy. This is the first I've heard of it. I need to talk with my team. I'll get back to you within a few days."
As of mid September, we have not heard back in response to our May 16 email or the May 28 phone call.
Rare bumblebees and other pollinators are being stressed and could be eliminated from two Somme Preserves. Commercial beehives on the property of Underwriters Labs, a few feet from the preserves, are seriously damaging the biodiversity of two legally protected Illinois Nature Preserves. Globally rare bees (including one on the Federal Endangered list) survive here in small numbers. Artificially high numbers of honeybees deplete resources that other bees need. The pollen and nectar that one beehive consumes would otherwise support about 100,000 wild bees. Underwriters has many thirteen hives installed. With this extractive force present, the preserves may lose recovering populations of native bees and other interdependent plants and wildlife.
On May 16, we wrote to Underwriter’s Labs:
At a property owned by the Forest Preserve District of Cook County, a Federal Endangered bumblebee (Bombus affinis) and other rare pollinators are being damaged by beehives installed on UL property immediately adjacent to Somme Prairie, an Illinois Nature Preserve in Northbrook, IL, USA. This huge alien bee population is depleting resources the rare and stressed native pollinators need. We've receive mixed messages on what the law says about this, but it seems likely that if UL carefully looked into it, as a matter of ethics, corporate responsibility, and good neighborliness, it would remove that stress. As a board member of Friends of Illinois Nature Preserves, we would appreciate any information on how to follow up further on this.
We have not yet received a response. As readers of this blog know, Friends of Illinois Nature Preserves have been steadily increasing capacity for stewardship. Increased capacity is needed for education and advocacy as well.
Bee welfare has been getting some good press lately. But the push to "save the bees" has missed the main point. Diverse wild bees are in trouble. Honeybees have many supporters - mostly not for the honey, but for crop pollination. Honeybees are big business, worth $200 billion dollars a year (see Endnote 1).
Less recognized, wild pollinators and other insects are fundamentally crucial to the ecosystem. “Insects of all kinds are declining in record numbers, and their deaths will have repercussions we cannot even imagine,” writes Ellen Cushing in the Atlantic. Shouldn't we hope rare bees would be secure in Nature Preserves protected at the highest levels by state law?
The first of two very rare bees found in the Somme preserves is called the Southern Plains Bumblebee.
Southern Plains Bumblebee on milkweed |
This species has rarely been found in Illinois, but it was found in Somme Prairie Grove last summer by a team of scientists studying the Rusty Patch Bumblebee (more about which below). It was fun to watch how surprised and elated these scientists were. This bee was once widely spread over southern states but is rapidly declining there, possibly due to global warming. It’s being considered for Federal Endangered status.
Southern Plains Bumblebee range map from NatureServe |
This bee is Critically Imperiled in 3 states, apparently gone from 3 others, at best Imperiled or Vulnerable in 5, with not enough info to rank in 18 others. Too few people study wild bees.
Both Somme Prairie and Somme Prairie Grove Nature Preserves have been found to support the only bumblebee currently on the Federal Endangered list, the Rusty Patch Bumblebee (Bombus affinis). It is thought to be gone from 13 states, is critically imperiled in ten states and in Canada, and is doing well nowhere.
Rusty Patch Bumblebee on wild bergamot at Somme |
Rusty Patch Bumblebee range map from NatureServe |
These rare bees are still uncommon at Somme. Despite years of gradual but increasingly successful restoration, high-quality habitat patches are still small. Thus the populations of rare plants and the animals (including bees) associated with them are growing but still small. Judging from many studies (see Endnote 2), the twelve hives of commercial honeybees placed just a few feet outside the preserve on Underwriters Labs property is stressing the populations of these rare bees.
Commercial bees in unnaturally high numbers contribute to the amplification and spread of bee diseases. They also weaken native bee populations by hyper-competitive consumption of pollen and nectar. As one study showed, a strong colony gathers as much pollen as could produce 100,000 progeny of an average solitary bee.
As these concerns were summarized by the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service (which supervises efforts to rebuild populations of Endangered species:
European honey bees (Apis mellifera) have documented negative effects on the reproductive success of bumble bees (e.g., Goulson and Sparrow 2009, Singh et al. 2010, and Thompson 2004). Additionally, pollen can be a vector for disease transmission between honey bees and bumble bees (e.g., Singh et al. 2010; Fürst et al. 2014, Graystock 2015). We recommend that managers discourage the placement of domesticated honey bee hives in natural areas with high quality habitat (abundant and diverse floral resources) where rusty patched bumble bees are likely to be present. We are not discouraging the use of honey bees in agricultural fields, but encourage landowners to plant native flowers and to try to keep their honey bee hives disease and pest free.
The Forest Preserve District has requested that Underwriters remove the hives. The damage they do to the Nature Preserves is likely illegal (see Endnote 3), but the pertinent laws are poorly tested, and litigation could be expensive. Perhaps publicity, good education, and an appeal to ethics and the public good would facilitate a consensus solution? Could a less damaging place (at least two miles away, the average honeybee foraging distance) be found for those hives?
We need more study, and science is good, but we know enough already not to risk extinctions. Habitat restoration is good, but it too is not enough. We need smart enforcement and advocacy. We also need education, since enforcement too is dependent on public support.
Are there Rachel Carsons for pollinators out there? Possibly you?
If you contact Underwriters and get a response, please tell us what you learn in "Comments" (below) or by email.
It's not clear who are the decision makers at UL. It recently reorganized into three separate companies.
The person to contact seems to be:
President and Chief Executive Officer Jennifer F. Scanlon
UL Solutions
333 Pfingsten Road
Northbrook, IL
847-272-8800
The property we're talking about is:
Underwriters Labratories
2500 Dundee Road
Northbrook, IL
Endnote 1: business
The $200 billion dollar a year honeybee business has money for lobbyists, science, and medicine. Honeybees, with all that firepower behind them, though stressed (see below), are doing fine. Adee Honey Farms owns more than 80,000 colonies and has over 100 employees. According to an Atlantic article by Ellen Cushing, the real money is in pollination services. Bees are trucked from place to place, so they can pollinate almonds, watermelons, pumpkins, cucumbers, alfalfa, onions, and other fine foods. As a result, honeybees, according to the USDA Census of Agriculture, have been the country’s fastest-growing livestock category since 2007. Honeybees have “colony collapse disorder” and other problems, caused in part by the explosive growth of that industry, but with research and care for honeybees well financed, their numbers continue to grow. Stressed and depleted honeybee hives are often parked for a while near natural areas to recover from pesticide exposure, restricted diets, and unnatural densities that contribute to diseases. But diseases then spread and overwhelming competition may damage the natural area’s native pollinators.
Endnote 2: threats
According to the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, the threats to bumblebees include "habitat loss, pesticide use, pathogens from managed pollinators, competition with non-native bees, and climate change."
Since this post is about advocacy – and thus, necessarily, politics – it seems worth it to decode those words. “Managed pollinators” and “non-native bees” refer to commercial bees. The Xerces Society does not want to offend beekeepers. Many beekeepers are nice, generous people who support biodiversity conservation and consider their work with commercial bees to be a positive thing. Fights often just lead to hardening of opinions.
Just to be clear: honeybees are needed. There’s no quick alternative for some crops. But there’s one place not to plunk down their hives, and that’s within their average foraging distance (two miles) of a Nature Preserve supporting rare wild pollinators. At Somme Prairie Nature Preserve the hives are a few feet to the other side of a cyclone fence. Somme Prairie Grove Nature Preserve is less than a fifth of a mile away.
Endnote 3: the law
Seeking a friendly agreement is always the first and best step. The courts are back-up at best, expensive and time-consuming, but sometimes needed.
(525 ILCS 30/21) (from Ch. 105, par. 721) |
(525 ILCS 30/22) (from Ch. 105, par. 722) |
(525 ILCS 30/23) (from Ch. 105, par. 723) |
References
U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Conservation Management Guidelines for the Rusty Patched Bumble Bee
YouTube presentation from Rich Hatfield of the Xerces Society
Ecosystem bees are not just being out competed. As Hatfield explains in detail, “Commercial bees are contributing to the amplification and spread of these diseases.” Wild honeybees are probably not significantly damaging populations of other bee species.
From Gauging the Effect of Honey Bee Pollen collection on Native Bee Communities by James Cane and Vincent Tepedino as published in Conservation Letters by the Society for Conservation Biology.
“From June-August, a strong colony gathers as much pollen as could produce 100,000 progeny of an average solitary bee.”
A study published in PLOS found higher rates of disease in bumblebees living near honeybee hives. Indeed, they found zero examples of some diseases in bumblebees living well away from hives.
For a review of the increased importance, understanding, and needs of pollinator conservation click here.
Experimental cross species transmission of a major pathogen in bees is predominantly from honeybees to bumblebees
By Anja Tehel, Tabea Streicher, Soon Tragust, and Robert Paxton
A Xerces Society Overview of the Potential Impacts of Honey Bees to Native Bees, Plant Communities, and Ecosystems in Wild Landscapes: Recommendations for Land Managers.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to author of bee and pollinator books, Heather Holm, for recommending the references cited above.
Southern Plaines Bumblebee photo by John Frisch/Flickr
Rusty Patch Bumblebee photo by Lisa Culp Musgrave
For helpful edits, thanks to Christos Economou and Eriko Kojima.
Does it matter where we live or is UL a major corporation?
ReplyDeleteGood question.
DeleteUnderwriters is a global corporation that cares about its image.
It's now divided into three companies, and it's hard to figure out which one has authority over its big property next to the Nature Preserves.
"UL Solutions", headquartered a few blocks away, describes itself as:
"As a global safety science leader, UL Solutions helps companies to demonstrate safety, enhance sustainability, strengthen security, deliver quality, manage risk and achieve regulatory compliance."
It's mission includes:
• To work with integrity and focus on quality to enhance the trust conveyed by our certification marks and services
• To be a good example of corporate citizenship and social responsibility
We can certainly hope that they care about their image. What they're doing is wrong.
You may want to add some helpful info from USFWS Conservation Guidelines of RPBB that specifically talks about recommendations for honeybees https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/ConservationGuidanceRPBBv1_27Feb2018_0.pdf
ReplyDeleteOh, yes, thanks. Very helpful. Now added to text and references. The key section on page 13 reads:
DeleteEuropean honey bees (Apis mellifera) have documented negative effects on the reproductive success of bumble bees (e.g., Goulson and Sparrow 2009, Singh et al. 2010, and Thompson 2004). Additionally, pollen can be a vector for disease transmission between honey bees and bumble bees (e.g., Singh et al. 2010; Fürst et al. 2014, Graystock 2015). We recommend that managers discourage the placement of domesticated honey bee hives in natural areas with high quality habitat (abundant and diverse floral resources) where rusty patched bumble bees are likely to be present. We are not discouraging the use of honey bees in agricultural fields, but encourage landowners to plant native flowers and to try to keep their honey bee hives disease and pest free.
The issue is that everyone loves honeybees and placing these hives is something seen as virtuous. I doubt there is much science indicating European Honeybees have any real benefit to the environment (just agriculture support). All of us are guilty of perpetuating the myth of these exotic bees helping the environment and this is what happens as a result. Does IL have a law to keep "recreational or virtue signaling" beehives away INAI or Nature Preserve areas? Does IL have laws or rules to promote placing native bee nesting devices in or outside of these areas? Does IDNR do anything at all to promote native bees with plantings and bee nesting habitat (artificial or natural)? IL has laws that cover every other aspect of our lives and not this seems unlikely we wouldn't have a law against bees placed in these areas were it a priority. Not to be mean but these exact questions are what ULs legal team would ask in court and that would be followed with a quick dismissal of the legal action. I can reach out to the people in charge of site stewardship "ratings" corporations use to try and make the site management aware of issues of randomly placing beehives close to Nature Preserves or in general. Before sending out nastygrams to CEO of companies, we should attempt to reach out to the people at the site first.
ReplyDeleteMichael, thanks for wise words.
DeleteIt would be good to know more about the "site stewardship 'ratings' corporations use."
And, yes, certainly it's best to "reach out to people at the site first." After past failures, we are again in conversation with UL site staff. We'll provide updates on this blog.
Most corporate local business units are evaluated by a group called Wildlife Habitat Council, the main focus is the property the business unit sits on (my plant gets no credit for the nature preserve work plant our volunteers do but we'd get credit for doing something on site). The local business unit of a company will be a client of WHC and another site that is also a client of WHC can reach out to their WHC contact to bubble something up to their other clients. I'd bet a Ben Franklin that a local beekeeper simply asked to put some hives next to those wildflowers and the site thought they were doing the right thing. If I were to google up benefits of honeybees I'd get the impression that we all should place hives near wildflowers or yard flowers and they'll be a tiny amount of search results regarding the impact to native bees. This may be an extreme position, but we should not recreational, small business, or virtue signal hives anywhere near natural areas. I would recommend those in contact with the people running the site to offer to do some research on helping out native bees. It looks to me that a person could hang 100s of those nest structures on that chain link fence. p.s. I did reach out to UL and WHC but I have no idea if anyone actually read those emails as I received no reply.
DeleteComment via Facebook:
ReplyDeleteIn my experience, advocacy is most effective when the request is made to the right person(s) at the right time (if there is one) by the right person(s).
Terrence Brady just retired as CEO of UL and is on LinkedIn. He may still be on the Board. You could contact him directly for his advice about the best way to approach UL to ask them to remove the hives and explain why.
Another option would be to ask (Forest Preserve Commissioner) Scott Britton to arrange a meeting for you and colleagues to meet with UL. I would ask him (or another elected official) to facilitate the meeting.
No doubt, this is a Tragedy of the Commons issue of epic proportions. There is so much damage control needed at this point to correct the faulty perception that HB keeping is eco-friendly and a Sustainable pursuit. Until there is clarity in the law, we need simple, concise messaging that is communicated to the general public that emphasizes Best Practices for Honey Beekeeping in areas where endangered RPBB's are present. It should include leaving a 4-mile buffer around any recent RPBB sightings or rare plant communities depending on the native bee community.
ReplyDeleteWorth taking a look at, this meta-analysis mentions " Even if restoration efforts improve habitat for native bees, the presence of A. mellifera may swamp out any benefits."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342486016_Grassland_restorations_improve_pollinator_communities_a_meta-analysis
Looking forward to hearing more updates. I'm hopeful UL will do the right thing.
ReplyDeleteAre there resources for better understanding the relationships between rare pollinators and insects and high quality habitats? And the possible downstream impacts of those relationship on other biodiversity - and related ecosystem services?
The Xerces Society is one good source. Can people recommend others?
DeleteWhat are your thoughts on River Trails Nature Center's active participation and promotion of honey beekeeping? See latest post on FB involving a Girl Scout project. I would think, knowing what is known now about competition and disease spread to wild bee populations, our NATURE centers would eventually steer away from an emphasis on honeybees in areas where endangered bees may still be found? On one hand it is a huge educational opportunity and hopefully winning people over into the conversation about BEE conservation. On the other hand, based on what I and other colleagues in the trenches are seeing, it is generating more confusion about which bees REALLY need help, with very real negative consequences on our wild bee communities as more and more people take up the hobby.
ReplyDeleteUsing honeybees as the poster bee for bee conservation is quite like using a chicken for bird conservation, or a Holstein to represent buffalos.
I remember going to Nature Centers as a child and being fascinated by the honeybee colony. It was educational. But I think you're right about it being time for a change. Although it would take more creativity, it would be great to display natural wild bees. It would be practical to develop live, wild bumble bee exhibits. Perhaps something could be done with the bees and wasps that use wood structures with drilled holes. I Googled "bee house wood drilled holes" - and many types are for sale. We have a home-made one at our house. We enthusiastically showed it to one neighbor who looked confused and asked, "What does it do to them?" She assumed it was some kind of control mechanism. A lot of education is needed.
DeleteYour language was great: "Using a poster honeybee for bee conservation is like using a poster chicken for bird conservation."
Keeping honeybees and bumble bees as farm animals for honey production and commercial pollination is potentially a good thing in some areas. Keeping such bees in exploitative ways such as to sicken them and spread disease is certainly not. The same is true for keeping them in ways that threaten natural pollinator biodiversity.