email alerts

To receive email alerts for new posts of this blog, enter your address below.

Friday, August 4, 2023

Summer Burn. Illinois Beach. August 3, 2023

 

Here's what it looked like the day after the burn:

Here's what an unburned part looked like:

Really?
They burned up stuff like this?
And it was a good thing?

Yes, it was. 

Parts of Illinois Beach Nature Preserve have been getting too brushy?
Is there an objective standard for what "too brushy" means?
Once again, yes there is. For more detail, see Endnote 1.

This photo shows death by shade. Here excessive numbers of young oaks and sprawling grape vines have largely killed off the turf of (rare) grasses and wildflowers on which the biodiversity of the Illinois Beach savanna depends. 

Oaks and grapes are good. But in the absence of adequate fire, they can become pathological to the ecosystem. 

Illinois Department of Natural Resources biologist Melissa Grycan led the six-acre burn in this 1,080-acre Nature Preserve. See map below: 

The burn started at the Dead River (south of the Dead River Trail) and burned to the Dune Trail and the east edge of the savanna. The photo below shows the south firebreak by the Dead River.


The savanna at Illinois Beach is mostly on old beach ridges and dunes. The sandy soil makes it likely that many patches will be so thinly vegetated that the fire will skip them. Here two plants of purple prairie clover, in bloom, were missed by the fire while a nearby young black oak was top-killed, as were other nearby plants. 

Summer fires are unusual on conservation land these days, but they shouldn't be. Explaining them to a skeptical public can be a challenge, but they can be very good for the ecosystem. For millions of years when all burns were started by lightning strikes, they could occur whenever dry lightning was possible and the vegetation was dry enough to burn. For example, on a day like August 3rd. 

Summer fires can be especially valuable for areas where too much brush has accumulated. Most controlled burns these days occur in late fall, winter, or early spring. Such dormant season burns set back brush, but much less than summer burns. When leaves have fallen, most of the chemical and energy resources of the shrubs and trees are stored in the roots. During the growing season, much of the plants accumulated resources are in the bark and leaves. The summer burn cuts off those resources, and the roots (which are all that survive) need to start over with much diminished resources. 

The photo above shows another spot along the firebreak. The flowers in bloom to the left are purple prairie clover and flowering spurge. The same were probably blooming to the right. They'll come back just fine after a rainstorm or two. Most herbaceous plant species of prairie and savanna are well adapted to surviving summer fires. 

How about animals? Most run away, or fly away, or go underground. A great many non-flying insects are killed, but they'll reproduce bountifully in the reinvigorated (and less brush-suppressed) ecosystem. 


Part of this prickly pear cactus looks burned and part looks fine, including about fourteen "pears" that will be popular with some animals later on. (We humans are not allowed to taste this fruit in this legally protected Nature Preserve.)

In many savannas, trees are well separated from each other. Here, arguably, too many trees were vying with each other. The big tree here should be fine. Many of the little trees will be top-killed or may die outright. That would be a good result in some areas here. 

Two final photos:

Here, with eastern towhees and bluebirds singing in the background, a part of the savanna appears to thrive following previous burns:



And out in the prairie ...
... we're reminded of what an extraordinary place this is. Savanna in the background. Prairie in the foreground. And a meadowlark singing to us as the cell phone camera snapped. 

If you're in the mood, please join us for stewardship and inspiration any Saturday at 9 AM at the Nature Center parking lot. We'll venture into the ecosystem from there. 

Endnotes

Endnote 1. What does "too brushy" mean? And why did parts of Illinois Beach get that way? 

Illinois Beach Nature Preserve is one of the highest quality and most important biodiversity reserves in the midwest. That's because of its very high-quality natural communities, which are known as such because of the great diversity of mostly-rare plants and the animals that depend on those plants. In the savanna and prairie ecosystems here, the biodiversity is dependent on the diverse turf of grasses, sedges, and wildflowers. When burns are insufficient, alien and native woody plants grow so dense that the ancient diverse turf is killed by shade. Where there had been twenty rare plant species per square yard, that number gradually gets reduced to ten, then perhaps one or two common species of plants. The animals that lived off those plants are then gone too. "Too brushy" is not philosophy or aesthetics. It is measurable and "life or death" for the health of the ecosystem. 

When the principal grassy fuel for the fires is gone, recovery is difficult. The savanna will not "succeed" into a natural forest, because the species that make one up are not here. So a depauperate and degraded savanna is all that survives unless resources are available for a lot of restoration.

"Fire-deprived" patches develop at Illinois Beach in part because of the care that has to be taken by burn managers to protect human health and air quality and certain endangered species (which have ways to deal with fire when they're in adequate numbers, but not in their reduced numbers today). 

We look forward to studying the results and expect to watch the healing recovery of colorful beauty and natural diversity in this summer-burned patch. 

Acknowledgements 

Thanks to Rebeccah Hartz for good edits, suggestions, and questions.

12 comments:

  1. I remember suggesting that people try growing season burns on prairies years ago after reading something Chris Helzer wrote. I don’t remember if it was his book, blog, or something else. The response I received from suggesting growing season burns was that they favor less conservative species over more conservative species. I do not doubt there is truth to this claim.

    I have never seen a growing season burn conducted. However, I have seen areas that were mowed to make spaces for events or to cut sweet clover. One observation from cutting various grasses and sedges is they bounce back well from losing all their above ground parts. All cutting grasses and sedges to the ground did was weaken them and reduce their seed set for the year. Some other plants cannot recover from defoliation. Indeed, that seem to be the main strategy to eliminate tall goldenrod and get higher quality species established. I have cut tall goldenrod in an area with lots of suburban nutrient enrichment to no effect. In contrast, in a lower nutrient situation with competition, tall goldenrod has so far appeared unable to recover from being selectively cut at ground level. The tall goldenrod is just put at too much of a disadvantage with other plants that were not cut, is unable to rebound, and disappears.

    Since grasses recover well from cutting, areas where summer mowing occurred became more grass dominated with only species that were able to compete well with tall grasses, like already established white false indigo, persisting. However, burning is different than mowing. A lot of nutrients are volatilized. With summer burning even more nutrients are volatilized than with dormant season burning. Tall grasses love nitrogen. Reducing the available nitrogen could increase space for smaller plants that make prairies such diverse ecosystems. Less nutrients mean less biomass and more light at ground level. Many prairie plants disappear if there is too much shade from (insert name of your favor weed here).

    Weakening perennial plants will create an opportunity for weedy native species, but also invasive species (crown vetch, sweet clover, etc.) I would expect to see a surge in sweet clover needing control next year.

    It will be interested to see the contrast between areas outside and inside the burn unit next season.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Perhaps more N is volatilized if vegetation is all dry, but everything that is cooked (this year's green) and not combusted is dumping its N out onto the ground at a time when opportunistic species may be able to capitalize. All the yellow in those pictures is cooked vegetation, and much of the N in that vegetation would have been largely drawn below ground for the dormant season, and anything left in dry litter would have been volitilized. Justin Thomas made a pretty good and data-supported argument at this year's NAPC that highlighted some of the downstream consequences of growing season burning within a nitrogen availability framework. The hurt on brush may be greater (though not usually enough to preclude need for other work), but Rubus, Rhus, etc. germination can also be stimulated in a big way by growing season nitrate pulses and/or heat scarification. Certain prairie species also seem to be intolerant of fire when they aren't dormant. I believe Justin Thomas recounted high mortality of a rare glade Liatris (the species skips my mind). In the western tallgrass, Escobaria missouriensis withdraws below ground in the dormant season and during extreme drought, avoiding fire. The prickly pears are also far less damaged in dormancy, because they lay flat on the ground, leaving the ground side of the cladode unscorched. Nitrogen aside, fire timing and intensity are very consequential for which growth forms (especially, grass growth form and dormant bud positions and reserves) are favored.

      Delete
    2. I wrote a blog post about my visit to Illinois Beach State Park on 10/21/2023. I do not think the grasses that have grown since the summer burn look deep green, as they would if the soil nitrogen high. However, the grasses have grown back thicker with the thatch removed. It is difficult to compare burned and unburned areas with all the thatch in unburned areas and the Sorghastrum nutans already getting fall color. The area under the chokecherries (that would not have burned as hot) is more green than adjacent areas in the images showing some chokecherries sprouting and others not sprouting. However, this is likely due to difference in species rather than fire effects.

      Please interpret the images from the blog post I wrote for Mr. Packard's readers.

      https://stewardshipchronicles.blog/2023/10/23/illinois-beach-state-park-summer-burn-comparison-images-from-10-21-2023/

      Delete
  2. Natural areas are impacted by many changed conditions, most generated by human economic activity. The diversity of changed conditions suggests that diverse management strategies are needed and that no single approach will prove to be a panacea for all problems. Summer fire is a neglected tool that should be tried more often. The fire described is less than 1% of the acreage of the site. One can learn more with multiple patches and a total treated area of 10% of site. As stated in the blog experience indicates woody vegetation is more heavily damaged by growing season fires than by dormant season ones. At IBSP increases in woody vegetation are probably favored by higher water levels in Lake Michigan. My experience is that woody plants that (presumably) were mortally wounded by a fire can take 3-4 years to die. Don’t base conclusions about this experiment solely one what is seen next year.

    ReplyDelete
  3. While I myself have put down fire in August or September for very specific reasons (given that it was not the normal rhythm of the historical community), and this burn had its own reasons, I would be much more conservative in my framing of growing season fire. There are many downstream effects related to nutrient dynamics and plant phenology, growth form, regenerative strategy that can lead to changes in composition. I can't think of any sites that receive regular fire that are in good/improving shape where growing season fires are more than rare (though that's usually May fire vs. August, and they are different). To the contrary, they open up some and then the ratchet moves them weedier/bramblier. It comes down to fire as a disturbance or stabilizing agent. Fire that removes smothering litter and volatilizes what little N is in it during the dormant season is salubrious to the native flora (borrowing from Wilhelm). Fire outside of that time is a disturbance that is usually directed towards to knocking back some thing or another that threatens that native flora. Sometimes the benefits may be worth the collateral effects if it is only a rarity with a backdrop of sufficient dormant burning. I would love to be wrong--to see mean C over time proving its efficacy, because these systems need a lot more fire and more burning options would be nice, but I am not optimistic about this site's fate two or three years hence, especially if it doesn't receive very intensive follow up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I suspect that this site is perceived as "needing" or "benefiting" from a growing season fire because it has already been destabilized by spring (mid-Feb to June) burning as considered "dormant season". I predict that an August fire in such a place will only send it spiraling faster down the drain of despair. It is shocking and horrifying that the deleterious effects of fire management are perceived as system problems rather than management/interpretation problems. Burning hotter, more often, or in ridiculously harmful conditions (like summer) are not viable solutions. They are people doubling down on error rather than questioning their tactics. Case in point, the now completely trashed, once gloriously intact, systems of the Indiana Dunes NP (despite the data/warnings collected by their fire effects crews that has been ignored for over 15 years now. I just don't know how we can possibly untangle these knots.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm curious as to why this is considered not the normal rhythm of the historical community, when lighting strikes could easily ignite a tree that subsequently ignites the prairie at this time of year. Also if Justin could link some of his data or talks that he's given, I think that would be helpful to anyone looking at this. It's interesting to focus on Nitrogen and burning, but I can think of a variety of reasons places have lowered in quality over the last 15 years: Prevalence of invasive species, lack of staff, lack of budget, etc. I also think it's important to keep in mind that "this site" is only a 6 acre portion of a 3k acre preserve, and it's easily accessed by a nature trail. If anyone wants to followup and watch the progression of the area they can.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Most fire while these systems were coming together as various floras expanded and contracted was dormant season. The historical accounts in the Upper Midwest are very near unanimous in that regard, and also those eastward. There are some growing season fire scars on oak trees, but those aren't frequent, and could quite possibly be the exceptional disturbance rather than the general rule of dormant fire--frequent dormant fire tends not to be intense, especially where the oak groves are that are used for study. I've seen annually burned mesic woods full of unscarred Allegheny birch. These systems aren't flammable in the growing season if they have burned during the preceding dormant season unless there is an exceptional drought. It is not a coincidence, I think, that the places that maintain their conservative, old-growth character best in this region are those that have had the most frequent fire (Bowles and Jones, Alstad et al., the precious few places with average fire return of 2 or less I can think of)...all between fall and early spring (early spring being more the custom). I've seen enough astounding recovery with annual dormant fire following initial brush work, that I have to wonder if other people just haven't seen these places? Astoundingly, I've met landowners that have told me that they started burning their woods 8, 10 years ago annually in the dormant season because it seemed like the thing to do, and standing in those places now...It sure was! The best prairies I know have all been burned at least every other year on average for decades after initial work to clear invasive brush. I've also seen seen a lot of mediocre or worse outcomes following growing season burning, use of goats, and other miscellaneous tools not suited to the purpose. Nature doesn't care about what we can or can't do or what we have at our disposal. It is what it is, and it works or what we have at our disposal. Tightly woven, old-growth and old-growth like prairies, savannas, and woods need dormant ignition just like they need winter, spring, summer, and fall. ...or some totally different new community will need some other stable, long-term condition. If prairies, savannas, and woods are healthy, they can recover from the odd off season burn, blow down, tornado, etc., but that off season burn isn't going to fix the damage caused by past fire exclusion and disturbance--that takes close, intimate work and over the re-established backdrop of dormant fire. That said, I hope this works out well.

      Delete
  6. It should be mentioned that the rare woody plants, including at least Ceanothus herbaceous, in the area receiving summer fire were protected. The only reason I noticed was they were in cages. I looked to see what the cages were protecting and realized effort had been made to minimize damage to the C. herbaceous shrubs from the summer burn.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is a fascinating and necessary conversation. I can't imagine that any natural area managers like using herbicides, so alternative methods for brush control should be investigated. On the other hand, I'd like to see any larger scale experimentation done on reconstructions rather than remnants.

    @James McGee (and any others who didn't flinch at the spelling "herbaceous" in that species epithet). The correct spelling is herbaceus, without O. Indeed, the letter sequence -OU- is virtually non-existent in Latin, even in the weird form of the language we use for biological nomenclature.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Herbicides are pretty necessary for turning around brush issues, and most stewards I interact with (quite a few volunteer stewards and landowners) have come to understand that. The thing with growing season burns is that while there is some (though mixed) evidence that they put a greater hit on brush, there is very little evidence of greater long-term mortality, and there is also evidence of stimulation of germination of some species that are problematic and being targeted by the burn. Sometimes high frequency is enough if the system is adequately flammable to carry frequent fire...that also doesn't eliminate brush, but in some cases can keep it low enough to not to diminish diversity. I think when it comes down to it, we just don't have a large scale treatment that can undo the direct and indirect harms of past land use and past neglect. In the end I think we'll focus resources on smaller areas and do that more tedious, intimate work...or we won't.

      Delete
    2. Using herbicides to control invading woody species in degraded areas is very intensive. I am following one such effort in a location some people have called the best remaining example of silt-loam savanna in the area. After the invading woody species are removed, and hot enough fires can be conducted to keep seedling invasive woody species from establishing, the work is not done. Herbaceous invasive species, like crown vetch, will fill open ground if not controlled. It is a long-term process to bring a site back to near remnant condition from degradation.

      https://stewardshipchronicles.blog/2023/08/12/bakers-lake-6-26-2023-and-8-8-2023/

      Delete